Thanks ESPN, I Didn’t Know Charles Barkley Was Retarded

Rich Sports

I’m sure most of the readers of this site spent their Monday night glued to the television watching our beloved Eagles succumb to agonizing defeat. The hurt is too near for me to discuss how disappointed I am with Donovan’s performance and I hold him too dear to my heart to write an article bashing him, so instead, I’ll take my excessive rage out on a party that deserves an equal amount of berating: ESPN. I sat down to Monday Night Football with a few Eagles fans, 3 of us clad in jerseys, Densen repping McNabb, Doug Avart repping Westbrook, and me, repping Trotter who didn’t even make the cut. ESPN started the night off with a bang. The HD looked great and that video with McNabb elegantly dodging twenty guys and then making the perfect pass pumped me up to the max. Then the evening took a turn for the worst. They showed us that goddamn GMC Chevrolet commercial 30 times. Honestly, starting every commercial break with the same commercial can have negative effects on your target demographic causing them to loath your product, especially if their football team is losing (Fuck you GMC, I’ll never buy one of your trucks). Then the announcers started talking about Andy Reid’s sons and didn’t stop talking about it for a half an hour. Yes, the Andy Reid’s sons’ stories are hilarious but we really don’t need a 15 minute debate on whether it’s affecting Andy’s coaching. During the game I want commentary about the game, not gossip. Then, seemingly out of nowhere, Charles Barkley walks into the announcer booth. I don’t know who or what gave Charles Barkley the idea that he is mentally qualified to do walk ins on commenting sessions for the National Football League. Let me give you some gems from Charles I managed to jot down during the game once I realized how absurd he was being.

  • “The media here is so powerful here, they tell us what to think.”
  • In response to a comment stating that if Reno hadn’t dropped that punt last week the Eagles would have won: “If I didn’t eat so much I wouldn’t be fat”

I think Charles Barkley might be retarded. I have no other explanation for his comments last night. They were rarely in response to anything else said. They sometimes were simple regurgitations of comments said minutes before. They were spoken with a slight slur / speech impediment. I rest my case.

Charles Barkley wasn’t the only perpetrator last night. The commentators just wouldn’t shut up. We missed the beginning of more than five plays because the announcers couldn’t wrap up their chats. And it’s not like their chats were interesting, although they did inform me that David Akers is into Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu during his final field goal. ESPN enhanced the shittyness of the Eagles making them even more excruciating to watch, which I thought was impossible until Monday Night. Thanks ESPN, thanks a lot.

- Rich

Published in:  on September 18, 2007 at 10:06 pm Comments (7)
Tags: , , , , , , ,

The Phils

Warsh Sports

This post will be solely dedicated to the Philadelphia Phillies. Let me start by saying that the Phillies are the true unifier in the Philadelphia area. White guy from the suburbs, black guy from west Philly, or Italian guy from south Philly, all love the striking red pinstripes on that crisp white home uniform equally. Even my cousin from Delaware likes the Phillies. Unfortunately the Phillies haven’t made the playoffs in 14 years. And that playoff season ended with one of the most gut wrenching losses in World Series history.

The Phillies can only be described as perpetually on the cusp. For convenience, I will divide the years since 1993′s infamous loss to the Blue Jays into 2 eras: The Rico Brogna Era (1994-1999) and the Jimmy Rollins/Pat Burrell era (2000-Present). Brogna was an extremely smooth fielding, 100 RBI threat at first base for the Phils some years ago. This was the same time I was a bona fide 8th grade baseball star, driving in a team leading 9 runs for the BC team. Brogna gave way to Travis Lee. The Travis Lee years were not even worth watching. The Braves were still rolling through the NL East each season, and the Phils had just traded Curt Schilling and were horrendous. One year Paul Byrd won like 9 first half starts and was named to the All Star team, by far the most pathetic representative in the franchise’s long history – barely edging out Vicente Padilla, the starting pitcher who could only muster one inning before bitching out of the all star game, forcing it to end in a tie. Padilla did have the Padilla Flotilla though, a crucial 2nd group to the wildly influential Wolf Pack. Those two were the trailblazers for all these amateur ones you see now.

In 2000, a young phenom debuted for the Phils. His name was Pat Burrell, and he was the next big thing, a face of the franchise prospect. The next year, a scrappy undersized shortstop made his debut, and was the Phils lone representative in the All star game in his rookie season. To this day Jimmy Rollins remains the Phillies most underrated player, a true superstar who this season should finish 2nd in the MVP voting to Albert Pujols, should the Cardinals make the playoffs. With 3 more triples, J-roll will have over 20 home runs, triples, doubles, and stolen bases on the season. The last player to accomplish this is Willie Mays. To be fair, the most monumental moment in the early years of the Rollins/Burrell Era was the signing of Jim Thome. It was huge for the Phils to pay for a top flight free agent after years of being cheap assholes. But Thome’s achy back and the emergence of Ryan Howard led to the trade of Thome for Aaron Rowand. Howard’s statistics speak for themselves, and his NL MVP award to cap a season of 58 Homers and 149 RBI’s in 2006 was the best individual season Philadelphia has seen since Iverson’s MVP year. While certainly a young superstar, many experts believe that Howard’s late Major League callup (he was 25, very late for a good hitting prospect) denied him valuable seasons that will leave him short of Home Run milestones that the Hall of Fame requires. Not to worry though. I am certain a member of this Phillies team will be going to the Hall of Fame.

It’s hard to segue into Chase Utley. The guy is the dream player. He does everything right, always plays his absolute hardest, and is just a very very good hitter. Unfortunately he is a horrifically bad actor. His commercial with Jamie Moyer had similar quality acting to the video I made for French class in 7th grade. It was still better than the one starring Ryan Madson. Ryan Madson, yes. Eude Brito must’ve been busy that day. Anyway, Utley has now started two straight all star games and looks like he’ll be starting about 10 more. The guy has zero competition at his position. His offense compares to the best batters in the league, while the rest of the 2nd basemen are terrible. Except for Brandon Phillips, who is a good enough player, but his career year this year doesn’t even compare to Utley’s, and Chase missed 5 weeks with a broken hand. Utley’s career batting average of .320 (estimated) and overall tenacity and adoration received will send Chase into the Hall. Of course, having Chase at 2nd base gives the Phils an automatic advantage over any team they play in at least one position, an advantage they squander with their atrocious pitching staff.

The Phils pitching was not helped when cbank park and its short fences arrived. The only truly good pitcher the Phils have is Cole Hamels, who of course felt some elbow pain and has missed his last couple starts. Even in his absence, and the absence of every single good player the Phils have at some point this year, the team came up huge in a 4 game series against the Mets, setting themselves up for both an NL East and a wild card chase. The Phils were 2 back in each race, in even better position than last year, when they only had the wild card to shoot for. I firmly believed the Phils would make the playoffs. Then they promptly lost 2 straight series, ruining their chances barring a major miracle. It was especially frustrating since I had been taking great care not to get too emotionally involved in the Phils this season. Those Mets games gave everyone hope, then everyone promptly got let down. The players change, but that never does.

- Warsh

Published in:  on September 6, 2007 at 7:57 pm Comments (2)

Connors vs. Federer… I mean Roddick vs. Federer

Danny Sports

Please tell me someone else watched the Roddick/Federer match last night. I would argue that the first two sets were some of the best tennis I have ever had the privilege of watching. Roger Federer, arguably the most dominate player in the history of sports, didn’t even have a break chance against Roddick until the sixth game of the third set. No, I am not talking about winning a break, just a break point! I have never thought so highly of a tennis player after watching him lose in straight sets. Roddick was on his game last night, and although Federer clearly showed he is by far the best player in the world, I made several other observations last night that I found to be interesting. Perhaps you will too.

Observation number 1: ATP, you need to figure out this whole coaching on the court thing. USA network, stop showing Jimmy Connors!!! He isn’t particularly attractive, and as Erica pointed out last night while watching the match; he looked like he was going to have a stroke at any moment. I firmly believe that tennis should be played by tennis players and that one of the things that differentiates it from almost every other sport is that 100% of the responsibility is placed on their shoulders. If they win, they win… If they lose, well then they lose. At the very least stop showing the coaches on T.V.! We have all heard about Butch Harmon, the famed swing coach formally in Tiger Woods’ camp and currently supplying Phil Mickelson with the tricks of the trade. How often have you seen him on T.V? Once? Twice? Certainly less than five times in all his years of coaching. Jimmy Connors must have gotten 10% of the total camera time last night… does anyone have a more accurate guess? It was out of control.

Observation number 2: Jimmy Connors… if you’re going to coach, tell your boy to stay the hell away from the net. Roddick was a dismal 18/36 (50%) when he approached the net last night. That is disgraceful. If you watched the match it looked like Federer was closing his eyes and simply placing his passing shots on the lines. I was actually shocked when I saw that he had even won 50% of his net points. He seemed much better off banging away from the baseline as he usually does.

Observation number 3: How many times is Roddick going to try to guess a direction incorrectly and then yell at himself for doing so? Guessing on a second serve? Yes, I understand wanting to run around your backhand, so you can hit your forehand, in an attempt to control the point but you don’t need to guess on Federer’s second serve. Roddick is the one serving 145 MPG, how can he let Federer have more aces than him?

Observation number 4: This is a stretch here so stay with me. Right now Roddick is 25. I don’t think that he has yet peaked as a tennis player. Did you see the match last night? Did anyone see that pathetic attempt at a drop shot that landed about 3 feet in front of the net? No other professional player ranked in the top ten in the world would even consider that as a legitimate option for that shot. Put the damn ball away! Let’s say for a second that in the next two years Roddick settles down, has a family, and actually makes tennis a priority in his life. Those stupid mistakes go away. That is the main difference between Roddick and Federer right now. Roddick CAN play with him. We saw that last night when he lost the two opening sets in close tiebreaks. If he actually spends a year or two getting into shape (seriously though does Federer even have sweat glands?), and maybe learning how to approach the net he could actually beat Federer. Maybe I am way off but my prediction is that Roddick will be playing much better tennis in 2009.

I never have and still don’t claim to be any sort of authority on sports. That being said…. Leave comments. It will only help make my future posts better.

- Dan

Published in:  on at 12:34 pm Comments (1)

Michigan Sucks… TV Coverage Blows

Danny Sports

Ahhh, it’s Saturday. Saturday is an extremely satisfying day to anyone. It can symbolize so many things. The start of a great weekend, a day of recovery after a long week of work or school, or, as was the case today, the first weekend of College Football. The first week of college football is always great. I mean sure, the quality of play is terrible, but in what other sport do you see huge schools find the most obscure opponents and invite them to their stadium to get destroyed? The system is great. A team such as my Penn State Nittany Lions will invite a tiny school no one has ever heard of to State College to get pounded; and throws them a few hundred thousand dollars for their trouble. A mere drop in the bucket of money that comes along with a home football game. The small school gets a nice chunk of dough, some serious free publicity, and the opportunity to gain experience by playing a perennial football powerhouse in front of 100 plus thousand fans. The bigger school gets a nice little “preseason” game in before the real competition starts. Anyway, today was the first day of college football and, as expected, I could head home from Beaver Stadium early in the second quarter knowing my team had won their first game. My good friends over in Ann Arbor weren’t so lucky in their game against division 1-AA’s Appalachian State. Yes, that is correct, the number 5, projected Big 10 winner, University of Michigan lost to Appalachian State today.

I won’t even go into how ludicrous it is for a team like Michigan to lose to Appalachian State. Rather, I would like to look at how the game was covered on television. The Big 10 Network had the rights to several of the noon games today. Both the Penn State game and the Michigan game were on that list. Residents of Ann Arbor were able to watch their Wolverines lose in the biggest upset in college Football history, while residents of Pennsylvania were able to watch their Nittany Lions take care of business. The problem arose when it was clear Penn State was going to be victorious and the unthinkable was about to happen and no one could watch. This is Michigan, the only road bump in Penn State’s 2005 road to an undefeated season. Now, clearly there are some issues with broadcasting contracts and the like, but come on. No network, (NBC, ABC, ESPN) was even allowed to show a highlight while the game was still in progress. Not even the Big Ten Network, the station that actually had legal rights to the game, was allowed to show any of it. Finally, as the PSU game came to a close we were able to catch the final five or ten minutes of the greatest upset in college football history. Honestly, this isn’t just bad entertainment; this is bad business. As a friend of mine was saying, one of the greatest things about March Madness is that networks are able to switch to games that are going to be a close finish or a big upset. If football were able to somehow make this happen, it would up the entertainment value of watching a game tenfold. I realize this is not about to happen any time soon but it is certainly a nice thought. Then, instead of watching Penn State’s third string quarterback throw to a receiver that will never actually see any legitimate playing time in his career, I could have been watching my least favorite team embarrass themselves in front of the entire nation. Goodbye Lloyd Carr.

- Danny